Benchmarking with:HammerDB logo

Which option is best overall? Cross-engine rankings.

The options are sorted top-down by performance/cost ratio, most efficient at the top of the list.

We conduct a standard HammerDB TPC-C benchmark.

The disk benchmarks are done with fio arguments --name=readwrite --rw=randrw --size=512M --numjobs=4 --time_based --runtime=60 --group_reporting.

  • where configurable we use a default size of 1000 GByte SSD for storage
  • for benchmarking we calculate the number of vUsers by vcores x 2
  • for benchmarking we calculate the number of Warehouses by vUsers x 5

Limited data preview

Part of the benchmark results are hidden. To fully unlock all data, apply for a subscription.

ProviderDB EngineDeploymentvCPU / RAMAvailabilityNewOrders/minuteTransactions/minuteMonthly cost / 1000 tpmBenchmark